Beesmer v. Heckler

Second Circuit

Beesmer v. Heckler

744 F.2d 10, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18680

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 11, 1984

DocketNo. 29, Docket 84-6097

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 744 F.2d 10 (Beesmer v. Heckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beesmer v. Heckler, 744 F.2d 10, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18680 (2d Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case presents just one issue: whether benefits paid plaintiff-appellant John E. Beesmer under New York State’s Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law are benefits “under a workmen's compensation law or plan of ... a State” within the meaning of the applicable offset provision of the Social Security Act in effect in 1975 when Beesmer became disabled, Pub.L. No. 89-97, § 335, 79 Stat. 286, 406 (1965) (amended 1981). The district court answered this question in the affirmative. The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Ralph W. Smith, Jr., dated December 12, 1984, and the Order of Judge Neal P. McCurn, dated February 9, 1984.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This case presents just one issue: whether benefits paid plaintiff-appellant John E. Beesmer under New York State’s Volunteer Firemen’s Benefit Law are benefits “under a workmen's compensation law or plan of ... a State” within the meaning of the applicable offset provision of the Social Security Act in effect in 1975 when Beesmer became disabled, Pub.L. No. 89-97, § 335, 79 Stat. 286, 406 (1965) (amended 1981). The district court answered this question in the affirmative. The judgment of the district court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Ralph W. Smith, Jr., dated December 12, 1984, and the Order of Judge Neal P. McCurn, dated February 9, 1984.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

744 F.2d 10, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beesmer-v-heckler-ca2-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack