Beesemyer-Ridnour Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 548
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1956
DocketReap. Dec. 8561; Entry No. 15154
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 548 (Beesemyer-Ridnour Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beesemyer-Ridnour Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 548 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

Eicwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement presents the question of the proper value of certain skinless and boneless sardines in olive oil. At the hearing, it was stipulated that the merchandise was freely offered for sale in the ordinary course of trade, in the usual wholesale quantities, in the principal market of the country of exportation, on the date of exportation at the entered value, which I understand to be the export value.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the entered value.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cust. Ct. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beesemyer-ridnour-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.