Beery v. Houghton
273 U.S. 671
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 21, 1927
DocketNo. 232
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases
This text of 273 U.S. 671 (Beery v. Houghton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beery v. Houghton, 273 U.S. 671 (1927).
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company, 272 U. S. 365.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miesz v. Village of Mayfield Heights
111 N.E.2d 20 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1952)
Cleveland Trust Co. v. Village of Brooklyn
110 N.E.2d 440 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1952)
Murdock v. Norwood
25 Ohio Law. Abs. 233 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County, 1937)
Leighton v. City of Minneapolis, Minn.
16 F. Supp. 101 (D. Minnesota, 1936)
Townsend's Petition
21 Pa. D. & C. 340 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Buckley v. Baldwin
230 A.D. 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Koch v. City of Toledo
37 F.2d 336 (Sixth Circuit, 1930)
State Ex Rel. City Ice & Fuel Co. v. Stegner
166 N.E. 226 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1929)
King Manufacturing Co. v. City Council of Augusta
277 U.S. 100 (Supreme Court, 1928)
State ex rel. McKusick v. Houghton
213 N.W. 907 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
273 U.S. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beery-v-houghton-scotus-1927.