Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark
This text of 151 A. 905 (Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that the judgment under review should be affirmed, and that it is sufficient to rest our affirmance upon the second ground contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra> without special consideration or discussion of the first ground set out in that opinion.
The judgment will accordingly be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloxd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Mo-G-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A. 905, 107 N.J.L. 372, 22 Gummere 372, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beers-v-broad-market-national-bank-of-newark-nj-1930.