Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark

151 A. 905, 107 N.J.L. 372, 22 Gummere 372, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 301
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 20, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 A. 905 (Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beers v. Broad & Market National Bank of Newark, 151 A. 905, 107 N.J.L. 372, 22 Gummere 372, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 301 (N.J. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We conclude that the judgment under review should be affirmed, and that it is sufficient to rest our affirmance upon the second ground contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra> without special consideration or discussion of the first ground set out in that opinion.

The judgment will accordingly be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloxd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Mo-G-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gohl
21 A.2d 693 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 A. 905, 107 N.J.L. 372, 22 Gummere 372, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beers-v-broad-market-national-bank-of-newark-nj-1930.