Beerman v. City of Kettering

Ohio Supreme Court

Beerman v. City of Kettering

235 N.E.2d 231, 13 Ohio St. 2d 149, 42 Ohio Op. 2d 371, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 484

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 20, 1968

DocketNo. 41032

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 N.E.2d 231 (Beerman v. City of Kettering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beerman v. City of Kettering, 235 N.E.2d 231, 13 Ohio St. 2d 149, 42 Ohio Op. 2d 371, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 484 (Ohio 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds itself in the same predicament as did the Court of Appeals. There is no bill of exceptions and no findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court.

In entertaining the appeal we were not fully aware of the situation as it has developed. For the reason stated, we cannot reach the merits of the controversy, and we' are constrained to affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmebmah, Matthias, Hebbebt, SchNeid-eb and BbowN, JJ., concur. Tboop, J., dissents. Tboob, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting, for O’Nehx, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI