Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

176 A.D.2d 171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 A.D.2d 565

Opinion

— Determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority, dated November 19, 1990, which found petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 by selling an alcoholic beverage to a minor, suspended its on-premises liquor license for 10 days and ordered a $1,000 bond claim, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Peter Tom, J.], entered October 31, 1990) is dismissed, without costs and without disbursements.

The AU’s finding, adopted by respondent, that petitioner allowed a minor to purchase an alcoholic beverage on August 21, 1987, is supported by substantial evidence, and this finding may not be disturbed by this Court. (M.D.M. Tavern Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., 157 AD2d 559.) Additionally, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. (Supra.) Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 176 A.D.2d 171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 171 (Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M.D.M. Tavern Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
157 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)