Beeman v. New York Central Railroad
This text of 23 A.D.2d 965 (Beeman v. New York Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: Under the allegations of paragraphs Eleventh and Thirteenth of the complaint, proof might be introduced to establish passive negligence of appellant and active negligence of respondent. (See Williams v. Twin Ponds Golf Associates, 23 A D 2d 956.) (Appeal from an order of Monroe Special Term dismissing cross complaint of defendant City of Canandaigua against defendant New York Central Railroad Co.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.2d 965, 261 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beeman-v-new-york-central-railroad-nyappdiv-1965.