Beeman v. Anthem Prescription

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 2014
Docket07-56692
StatusPublished

This text of Beeman v. Anthem Prescription (Beeman v. Anthem Prescription) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription, (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY No. 07-56692 SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY D.C. No. HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC., CV-04-00407- doing business as Finleys Rexall VAP Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY INC., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, doing business as Pearson Medical Group Pharmacy; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT, LLC; ARGUS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; BENESCRIPT SERVICES, INC.; FFI RX MANAGED CARE; FIRST HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION; MANAGED PHARMACY BENEFITS, INC., formerly known as Cardinal Health MPB Inc.; NATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH CARD 2 BEEMAN V. ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION

SYSTEMS, INC.; PHARMACARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.; PRIME THERAPEUTICS; RESTAT CORPORATION; RX SOLUTIONS, INC.; TMESYS, INC.; WHP HEALTH INITIATIVES, INC.; MEDE AMERICA CORP., Defendants-Appellants.

JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY No. 07-56693 SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY D.C. No. HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC., CV-02-01327- doing business as Finleys Rexall VAP Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY ORDER INC., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, doing business as Pearson Medical Group Pharmacy; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

TDI MANAGED CARE SERVICES, INC., doing business as ECKERD HEALTH SERVICES; MEDCO BEEMAN V. ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION 3

HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.; EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.; ADVANCE PCS, Advance PCS Health, L.P.; RX SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

Filed January 29, 2014

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Sidney R. Thomas, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Richard R. Clifton and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The case is remanded to the three-judge panel for consideration in light of the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC, No. S203124 (Cal. Dec. 19, 2013). The prior panel opinion, 652 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2011), is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beeman-v-anthem-prescription-ca9-2014.