Beekman v. Reeve
44 N.J. Eq. 295
Opinion
This decree affirmed for the reasons given by the Vice-Chancellor.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Knapp, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Whitaker — 11.
For reversal — Dixon, Paterson — 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beekman v. Reeve, 44 N.J. Eq. 295 (N.J. 1888).
44 N.J. Eq. 295 (Beekman v. Reeve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Ida Maude Sowell, Homer T. Sowell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
708 F.2d 1564 (Tenth Circuit, 1983)
Hicks v. Jones
47 A.2d 894 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Smith v. Field
131 A. 521 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)