Beekman v. Reed
5 Cow. 23
This text of 5 Cow. 23 (Beekman v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beekman v. Reed, 5 Cow. 23 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
Opinion
The notice is insufficient; and we cannot hear the motion. The regular practice is to notice for the particular term at which the motion is to be made; and we must not allow this course to be departed from, where no reason is shown for it. Causes cannot be continued in this manner by a single notice running from term to term.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Cow. 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beekman-v-reed-nysupct-1825.