Beekman v. Franker
3 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 446
Opinion
[95]*95IT was ruled that ignorance of the necessity of employing an attorney, previous to the trial of the cause» is not sufficient to induce the [96]*96court i0 set aside a regular default and subsequent pro»
Ceedings, though accompanied with- a strong affidavit of merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beekman v. Franker, 3 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 446 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
3 Cai. Cas. 95 (Beekman v. Franker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bogardus v. Livingston
7 Abb. Pr. 428 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1858)