Home/New York Supreme Court/Beekman v. Franker

Beekman v. Franker

3 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 446
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1805
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 95 (Beekman v. Franker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beekman v. Franker, 3 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 446 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Opinion

[95]*95IT was ruled that ignorance of the necessity of employing an attorney, previous to the trial of the cause» is not sufficient to induce the [96]*96court i0 set aside a regular default and subsequent pro»

NEW-YORK, May, 1805.

Ceedings, though accompanied with- a strong affidavit of merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bogardus v. Livingston
7 Abb. Pr. 428 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 95, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beekman-v-franker-nysupct-1805.