Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Beekman Family Ass'n v. Town of Oyster Bay

Beekman Family Ass'n v. Town of Oyster Bay

228 A.D.2d 460, 643 N.Y.2d 1023, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6598
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 460 (Beekman Family Ass'n v. Town of Oyster Bay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beekman Family Ass'n v. Town of Oyster Bay, 228 A.D.2d 460, 643 N.Y.2d 1023, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court’s conclusion that the defendant did not breach the condition subsequent contained in the deed in question was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and was, therefore, not against the weight of the evidence (see, Greenberg v Behlen, 220 AD2d 720; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicastro v. Park
113 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Greenberg v. Behlen
220 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 460, 643 N.Y.2d 1023, 643 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beekman-family-assn-v-town-of-oyster-bay-nyappdiv-1996.