Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.

433 So. 2d 59

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1983·No. No. 82-2349·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is an implied warranty that a product will be suitable for the purpose for which it is purchased. When the evidence [60] discloses that this is not the case, the purchaser has a right to recover his damages occasioned by the use of the product. Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla.1972); In Be Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Smith v. Burdine’s Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); Medlin v. Rucks, 397 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Chrysler Corporation v. Miller, 310 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Arcade Steam Laundry v. Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section 672.315 Florida Statutes (1977).

The final judgment here under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is an implied warranty that a product will be suitable for the purpose for which it is purchased. When the evidence [60] discloses that this is not the case, the purchaser has a right to recover his damages occasioned by the use of the product. Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla.1972); In Be Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Smith v. Burdine’s Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); Medlin v. Rucks, 397 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Chrysler Corporation v. Miller, 310 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Arcade Steam Laundry v. Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section 672.315 Florida Statutes (1977).

The final judgment here under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc., 433 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

433 So. 2d 59 (Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related