Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.
This text of 433 So. 2d 59 (Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is an implied warranty that a product will be suitable for the purpose for which it is purchased. When the evidence [60]*60discloses that this is not the case, the purchaser has a right to recover his damages occasioned by the use of the product. Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla.1972); In Be Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Smith v. Burdine’s Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); Medlin v. Rucks, 397 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Chrysler Corporation v. Miller, 310 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Arcade Steam Laundry v. Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section 672.315 Florida Statutes (1977).
The final judgment here under review is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 So. 2d 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beede-elegtrical-instrument-co-v-kes-inc-fladistctapp-1983.