Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.

433 So. 2d 59
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1983
DocketNo. 82-2349
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 433 So. 2d 59 (Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beede Elegtrical Instrument Co. v. K.E.S., Inc., 433 So. 2d 59 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is an implied warranty that a product will be suitable for the purpose for which it is purchased. When the evidence [60]*60discloses that this is not the case, the purchaser has a right to recover his damages occasioned by the use of the product. Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla.1972); In Be Estate of Yohn, 238 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1970); Smith v. Burdine’s Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); Medlin v. Rucks, 397 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Chrysler Corporation v. Miller, 310 So.2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Arcade Steam Laundry v. Bass, 159 So.2d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Section 672.315 Florida Statutes (1977).

The final judgment here under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. Holman
470 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 So. 2d 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beede-elegtrical-instrument-co-v-kes-inc-fladistctapp-1983.