Beecroft v. Great Northern Railway Co.

242 U.S. 618, 37 S. Ct. 213, 61 L. Ed. 530, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1415
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 11, 1916·No. No. 699·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs on the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, ante, 169. Mr. Tom Davis and Mr. Ernest A. Michel for the plaintiff in error. Mr. E. C. Bindley, Mr. A. L. Janes and Mr. M. L. Countryman for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beecroft v. Great Northern Railway Co., 242 U.S. 618, 37 S. Ct. 213, 61 L. Ed. 530, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1415 (1916).

242 U.S. 618 (Beecroft v. Great Northern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monsanto Co. v. Cochran
180 So. 2d 624 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Feldman v. Capitol Piece Dye Works, Inc.
185 F. Supp. 426 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Frank v. Stiegler
84 N.W.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1957)
Margolis v. GEM Factors Corp.
201 F.2d 803 (Second Circuit, 1953)
In re Talbot Canning Corp.
39 F. Supp. 858 (D. Maryland, 1941)
Syracuse Engineering Co. v. Haight
110 F.2d 468 (Second Circuit, 1940)
Atlas v. Eastern Yarn Mills, Inc.
27 F. Supp. 478 (E.D. New York, 1939)
Bowling Green-Hopkinsville Bus Co. v. Edwards
59 S.W.2d 584 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)
Parker v. New England Oil Corporation
13 F.2d 158 (D. Massachusetts, 1926)