Beecher v. Ohio State Home Serv., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Beecher v. Ohio State Home Serv., Inc.

690 N.E.2d 549, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1456, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 681

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1998

Docket98-120

StatusPublished

This text of 690 N.E.2d 549 (Beecher v. Ohio State Home Serv., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beecher v. Ohio State Home Serv., Inc., 690 N.E.2d 549, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1456, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 681 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 18439. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following question:

“When the validity of a contract containing an arbitration clause is challenged based on a general claim of fraudulent inducement, must the trial court first determine whether the contract is valid before submitting the case to arbitration, or is this only required when the claim of fraudulent inducement is specifically directed at the arbitration clause?”

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 96-1803, ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woods, Fairfield App. No. 95CA50; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 18439. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists on the following question:

“When the validity of a contract containing an arbitration clause is challenged based on a general claim of fraudulent inducement, must the trial court first determine whether the contract is valid before submitting the case to arbitration, or is this only required when the claim of fraudulent inducement is specifically directed at the arbitration clause?”

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 96-1803, ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woods, Fairfield App. No. 95CA50; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

690 N.E.2d 549, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1456, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beecher-v-ohio-state-home-serv-inc-ohio-1998.