Beecham v. Beecham
447 So. 2d 396, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421
Opinion
The judgment under review, which was entered pursuant to our decision in Beecham v. Beecham, 407 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), is in complete accordance with that opinion and represents an unassailable exercise of the trial court’s discretion in the light of the record as supplemented by evidence taken after remand. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beecham v. Beecham, 447 So. 2d 396, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
447 So. 2d 396 (Beecham v. Beecham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Beecham v. Beecham
407 So. 2d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)