Beecham v. Beecham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beecham v. Beecham

447 So. 2d 396, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 20, 1984

DocketNo. 83-2287

StatusPublished

This text of 447 So. 2d 396 (Beecham v. Beecham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beecham v. Beecham, 447 So. 2d 396, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review, which was entered pursuant to our decision in Beecham v. Beecham, 407 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), is in complete accordance with that opinion and represents an unassailable exercise of the trial court’s discretion in the light of the record as supplemented by evidence taken after remand. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review, which was entered pursuant to our decision in Beecham v. Beecham, 407 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), is in complete accordance with that opinion and represents an unassailable exercise of the trial court’s discretion in the light of the record as supplemented by evidence taken after remand. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 So. 2d 396, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beecham-v-beecham-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack