Beech Grove Investment Co. v. Civil Rights Commission

157 N.W.2d 213, 380 Mich. 405, 1968 Mich. LEXIS 157
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 1, 1968
DocketCalendar No. 42, Docket No. 51,869
StatusPublished
Cited by52 cases

This text of 157 N.W.2d 213 (Beech Grove Investment Co. v. Civil Rights Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beech Grove Investment Co. v. Civil Rights Commission, 157 N.W.2d 213, 380 Mich. 405, 1968 Mich. LEXIS 157 (Mich. 1968).

Opinions

Adams, J.

I. The Facts AND ProceediNgs.

In 1964, Freeman M. Moore, a 38-year-old Negro, lived with, his wife and two children in Inkster, Michigan. He had served nine years as a science teacher in the Ecorse high school before becoming a counselor, in which capacity he had served two years. He held three college degrees — a bachelor’s degree from Springfield College, a master’s degree in public health from Columbia University, and a master’s degree in counseling and guidance from Eastern Michigan University. His wife was a nurse anesthetist at Metropolitan Hospital, Detroit.

Freeman Moore became interested in the Georgetown Green subdivision, owned by plaintiff Beech Grove Investment Company, through an advertisement in the Detroit Free Press. The advertisement is reproduced herein. After driving through the subdivision, he called the telephone number listed in the ad and requested a brochure and other information. He received the brochure in March, 1964, and discussed the possibilities with his wife. In May, 1964, the Moores decided not to investigate further because Mrs. Moore felt the Georgetown Green subdivision might become a tension area.

In September, 1964, a brochure and letter were mailed to Freeman Moore relating to the development of North Georgetown Green subdivision. The brochure recreated the Moores’ interest. Mr. Moore called the sales manager. He had several conversations with him and was mailed a plat plan of the subdivision. On one occasion, not being able to reach the manager, his call was transferred to Mr. Frank Schell, a salesman. In October, 1964, Moore told Schell by telephone that they were interested in Lot 146 in the North Georgetown Green subdivision. Later, he was informed that Lot 146 had been

[413]*413

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC
Michigan Supreme Court, 2025
Rafaeli LLC v. Oakland County
Michigan Supreme Court, 2020
Susan Blackwell v. Dean Franchi
Michigan Supreme Court, 2020
Doe v. Department of Corrections
312 Mich. App. 97 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2015)
John Doe 1 v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2015
Bailey v. Schaaf
835 N.W.2d 413 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2013)
Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co Inc
828 N.W.2d 660 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2013)
Woodman v. Kera LLC
785 N.W.2d 1 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)
Studier v. Michigan Public School Employees' Retirement Board
698 N.W.2d 350 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)
Stitt v. Holland Abundant Life Fellowship
614 N.W.2d 88 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
Robinson v. City of Detroit
613 N.W.2d 307 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Bulger
614 N.W.2d 103 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
Heurtebise v. Reliable Business Computers, Inc
550 N.W.2d 243 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1996)
People v. Kevorkian
527 N.W.2d 714 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1994)
People v. Nash
341 N.W.2d 439 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stevenson
331 N.W.2d 143 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.W.2d 213, 380 Mich. 405, 1968 Mich. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beech-grove-investment-co-v-civil-rights-commission-mich-1968.