Beebe v. Trafford

1 Kirby 215
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1787
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Kirby 215 (Beebe v. Trafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beebe v. Trafford, 1 Kirby 215 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).

Opinion

By the whole Court.

It appears, by tbe submission, that it was the intention of the parties, to refer the whole matter of the damages done by the trespass, on the body of the infant, to the decision of the arbitrators; and the award is correspondent to tbe submission: And tbe plaintiff bad right to receive satisfaction for the trespass done to his son (as be was his natural guardian) as well as for tbe damage done to himself; and it is immaterial whether the damage was ascertained by agreement of tbe parties, or award of arbitrators: Therefore, a recovery in this case will be a bar of any action [218]*218for that trespass, and the awarding entire damages cannot prejudice the defendant. — So judgment was for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt
691 S.E.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Kirby 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beebe-v-trafford-connsuperct-1787.