Beebe v. Paddock

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. Cas. 135, 2 Johns. Cas. 117
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

A QUESTION arose as to the regularity of a service of a notice, which appeared from affidavit to have been made on the clerk of the attorney; the court decided, that as it did not also appear that the notice was served on the clerk while he was in the office, it was, therefore, insufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beebe v. Paddock, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. Cas. 135, 2 Johns. Cas. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135 (Beebe v. Paddock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Alameda Turnpike Road Co.
30 Cal. 182 (California Supreme Court, 1866)