Beebe v. Paddock
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. Cas. 135, 2 Johns. Cas. 117
This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135 (Beebe v. Paddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beebe v. Paddock, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. Cas. 135, 2 Johns. Cas. 117 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
A QUESTION arose as to the regularity of a service of a notice, which appeared from affidavit to have been made on the clerk of the attorney; the court decided, that as it did not also appear that the notice was served on the clerk while he was in the office, it was, therefore, insufficient.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Alameda Turnpike Road Co.
30 Cal. 182 (California Supreme Court, 1866)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 135, 1 Cole. Cas. 135, 2 Johns. Cas. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beebe-v-paddock-nysupct-1800.