Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc.

133 So. 2d 338

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1961·No. No. 2201·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from final decree adverse to appellant as plaintiff in suit for equitable relief on alleged ground of fraudulent misrepresentation with respect to plaintiff’s purchase of certain corporate stock. The decree appealed is affirmed. See: Fote v. Reitano, et al., Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 891; Potaker v. Hurtak, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 502 ; 23 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 155, page 261; 24 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 264, page 98.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and FUS SELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from final decree adverse to appellant as plaintiff in suit for equitable relief on alleged ground of fraudulent misrepresentation with respect to plaintiff’s purchase of certain corporate stock. The decree appealed is affirmed. See: Fote v. Reitano, et al., Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 891; Potaker v. Hurtak, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 502 ; 23 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 155, page 261; 24 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 264, page 98.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and FUS SELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.

Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc., 133 So. 2d 338 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

133 So. 2d 338 (Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related