Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc.

133 So. 2d 338

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 29, 1961

DocketNo. 2201

StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 2d 338 (Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beebe v. Movitz Enterprises, Inc., 133 So. 2d 338 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from final decree adverse to appellant as plaintiff in suit for equitable relief on alleged ground of fraudulent misrepresentation with respect to plaintiff’s purchase of certain corporate stock. The decree appealed is affirmed. See: Fote v. Reitano, et al., Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 891; Potaker v. Hurtak, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 502 ; 23 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 155, page 261; 24 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 264, page 98.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and FUS SELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from final decree adverse to appellant as plaintiff in suit for equitable relief on alleged ground of fraudulent misrepresentation with respect to plaintiff’s purchase of certain corporate stock. The decree appealed is affirmed. See: Fote v. Reitano, et al., Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 891; Potaker v. Hurtak, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 502 ; 23 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 155, page 261; 24 Am.Jur., Fraud and Deceit, Sec. 264, page 98.

Affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., WHITE, J., and FUS SELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 So. 2d 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beebe-v-movitz-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack