Bee Jay Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
This text of 204 F.2d 272 (Bee Jay Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
204 F.2d 272
BEE JAY PRODUCTS, Inc; Joseph Berkowitz and Reuben
Berkowitz, individually and as officers of Bee Jay Products,
Inc.; Universal Manufacturing Company, a corporation; Reuben
Berkowitz and Bertha Berkowitz, individually and as officers
of Universal Manufacturing Company, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 4581.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
May 14, 1953.
On Petition to Review an Order of the Federal Trade Commission.
F. W. James, Evanston, Ill., for petitioners.
John W. Carter, Jr., Atty., Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. (W. T. Kelley, General Counsel, and Robert B. Dawkins, Asst. General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before BRATTON, HUXMAN, and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of Gay Games, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 10 Cir., 204 F.2d 197, the order of the Commission is affirmed and judgment will be entered enforcing such order in accordance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F.2d 272, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4316, 1953 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bee-jay-products-inc-v-federal-trade-commission-ca10-1953.