Bedwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bedwell v. State

865 So. 2d 655, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1559, 2004 WL 256447

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 2004

DocketNo. 1D01-2481

StatusPublished

This text of 865 So. 2d 655 (Bedwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bedwell v. State, 865 So. 2d 655, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1559, 2004 WL 256447 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of the appellant’s facially sufficient postconviction claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate evidence that the appellant asserts would have proven his innocence. On remand, the trial court should either hold an evi-dentiary hearing or attach record excerpts sufficient to refute the appellant’s claims.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s summary denial of the appellant’s facially sufficient postconviction claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate evidence that the appellant asserts would have proven his innocence. On remand, the trial court should either hold an evi-dentiary hearing or attach record excerpts sufficient to refute the appellant’s claims.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

865 So. 2d 655, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1559, 2004 WL 256447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedwell-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.