Bedoy v. State

829 So. 2d 399, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16067, 2002 WL 31466443
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 2002
DocketNo. 3D02-1774
StatusPublished

This text of 829 So. 2d 399 (Bedoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bedoy v. State, 829 So. 2d 399, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16067, 2002 WL 31466443 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

Juan Bedoy appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State concedes that defendant-appellant Bedoy is entitled to a hearing in light of Picariello v. State, 728 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (quoting Kessell v. State, 713 So.3d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)). We reverse the order now under review and remand for a hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Picariello v. State
728 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 So. 2d 399, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16067, 2002 WL 31466443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedoy-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.