Bedgood v. Floyd

93 S.E. 218, 20 Ga. App. 617, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1002
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1917·No. 8671·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

George, J.

This was a statutory motion to set aside a judgment. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4358, 5958. It is essential to the validity of such .a motion that it affirmatively appear that the motion was presented to the judge and filed in term time. It affirmatively appears, from the record that the motion was presented to the judge of the superior court at chambers, and the bill of exceptions recites that it was “made in vacation after the court had adjourned.” Having been begun in vacation, the proceeding was a nullity, and the judge of the superior court had no authority to entertain the motion. See Malsby v. Studstill, 127 Ga. 726, 728 (56 S. E. 988), and cases there cited. The order denying the motion will be construed as an order dismissing it; and, for the reason stated, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bedgood v. Floyd, 93 S.E. 218, 20 Ga. App. 617, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1002 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

93 S.E. 218 (Bedgood v. Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNabb v. Russell
165 S.E. 879 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Brown v. Marbut-Williams Lumber Co.
123 S.E. 899 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Buchannon v. Park
104 S.E. 20 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Ohlen v. McCoy
103 S.E. 803 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Swicord v. Grady County
101 S.E. 395 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Lovett v. Vickers Bros.
100 S.E. 755 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)