Bedford v. State

417 So. 2d 771, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1982
DocketNos. 80-1060, 80-1375
StatusPublished

This text of 417 So. 2d 771 (Bedford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bedford v. State, 417 So. 2d 771, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court committed reversible error in refusing to instruct the jury on temporary unauthorized use of an automobile, an offense which is one step removed from the grand theft for which the defendants were convicted. State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1978); Hunter v. State, 389 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Garrett v. State, 335 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Because we reverse on this issue, we need not consider the other issues on appeal.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. State
389 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Garrett v. State
335 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 So. 2d 771, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedford-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.