Bedford v. State
417 So. 2d 771, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20740
Opinion
The trial court committed reversible error in refusing to instruct the jury on temporary unauthorized use of an automobile, an offense which is one step removed from the grand theft for which the defendants were convicted. State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1978); Hunter v. State, 389 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Garrett v. State, 335 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Because we reverse on this issue, we need not consider the other issues on appeal.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bedford v. State, 417 So. 2d 771, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
417 So. 2d 771 (Bedford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hunter v. State
389 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Garrett v. State
335 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)