Bedford Building Co. v. Beame
349 N.E.2d 874, 39 N.Y.2d 739, 384 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2696
This text of 349 N.E.2d 874 (Bedford Building Co. v. Beame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bedford Building Co. v. Beame, 349 N.E.2d 874, 39 N.Y.2d 739, 384 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2696 (N.Y. 1976).
Opinion
Motion, treated as one to amend remittitur, granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: "Order affirmed, with costs to petitioners-respondents against all intervenors-appellants except Isidore Untenberg and Frances Ebanks. Opinion Per Curiam. All Concur.” [See 38 NY2d 729.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
BEDFORD BLDG. CO. INC. v. Beame
343 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
349 N.E.2d 874, 39 N.Y.2d 739, 384 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedford-building-co-v-beame-ny-1976.