Bedford Building Co. v. Beame
349 N.E.2d 874, 39 N.Y.2d 739, 384 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2696
Opinion
Motion, treated as one to amend remittitur, granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: "Order affirmed, with costs to petitioners-respondents against all intervenors-appellants except Isidore Untenberg and Frances Ebanks. Opinion Per Curiam. All Concur.” [See 38 NY2d 729.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bedford Building Co. v. Beame, 349 N.E.2d 874, 39 N.Y.2d 739, 384 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2696 (N.Y. 1976).
349 N.E.2d 874 (Bedford Building Co. v. Beame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BEDFORD BLDG. CO. INC. v. Beame
343 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)