Bedell v. Sturta

1 Bosw. 634
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 3, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Bosw. 634 (Bedell v. Sturta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bedell v. Sturta, 1 Bosw. 634 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1857).

Opinion

Bosworth, J.

As the cause of action is one which would authorize an execution'against the body, in case of a recovery, the order will not be vacated merely because the cause of action is denied. The opposing affidavits sustain that on which the order was granted. The complaint will not be set aside after an answer put in, merely because the summons was irregular. If the order of arrest is not wholly void, it should not be set aside for such irregularity, on a motion made after answer; if wholly void, the defendant does not need the interposition of the Court. Motion denied, with seven dollars costs to plaintiff, to abide the event See Union Bank v. Mott, 6 Abb. P. R. 315, and the cases cited, in a note to it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Royal Insurance v. Noble
5 Abb. Pr. 54 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1868)
Swift v. Wylie
5 Rob. 680 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1867)
Cousland v. Davis
17 Bosw. 619 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Bosw. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedell-v-sturta-nysuperctnyc-1857.