Bedell v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bedell v. New York State Liquor Authority

74 A.D.2d 603, 424 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10253

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 74 A.D.2d 603 (Bedell v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bedell v. New York State Liquor Authority, 74 A.D.2d 603, 424 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent, dated August 14, 1979 and made after a hearing, as found that petitioner suffered or permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly on certain dates, revoked its restaurant liquor license, directed that no new license be issued for said premises for 24 months, and imposed a bond claim of $1,000. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and [604]*604proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the respondent is supported by substantial evidence and the punishment imposed is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent, dated August 14, 1979 and made after a hearing, as found that petitioner suffered or permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly on certain dates, revoked its restaurant liquor license, directed that no new license be issued for said premises for 24 months, and imposed a bond claim of $1,000. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and [604]*604proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the respondent is supported by substantial evidence and the punishment imposed is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 603, 424 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedell-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1980.