Bedell v. Greensville Correctional Center

Fourth Circuit

Bedell v. Greensville Correctional Center

38 F. App'x 173

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2002·No. No. 02-6469·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Bedell appeals the district court order and judgment dismissing his complaint for failing to include an original signature as required by Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bedell v. Greensville Correctional, No. CA-01-892-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Bedell appeals the district court order and judgment dismissing his complaint for failing to include an original signature as required by Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bedell v. Greensville Correctional, No. CA-01-892-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bedell v. Greensville Correctional Center, 38 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

38 F. App'x 173 (Bedell v. Greensville Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.