Bedell v. Greensville Correctional Center
This text of 38 F. App'x 173 (Bedell v. Greensville Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clinton Bedell appeals the district court order and judgment dismissing his complaint for failing to include an original signature as required by Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bedell v. Greensville Correctional, No. CA-01-892-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 F. App'x 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedell-v-greensville-correctional-center-ca4-2002.