Bedell v. Bailey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Bedell v. Bailey

58 N.H. 62

DecidedDecember 5, 1876

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.H. 62 (Bedell v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bedell v. Bailey, 58 N.H. 62 (N.H. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Bingham, J.

No judge of probate shall act as such in the settlement of any estate in which lie is interested asan executor. Gen. St., c. 170, s. 11. In such a case lie has, and can have, no jurisdiction. The acts of Bedell were absolutely void. Stearns v. Wright, 51 N. H. 610; Moses v. Julian, 45 N. H. 60.

Demurrer overruled.

Doe, O. J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bingham, J.

No judge of probate shall act as such in the settlement of any estate in which lie is interested asan executor. Gen. St., c. 170, s. 11. In such a case lie has, and can have, no jurisdiction. The acts of Bedell were absolutely void. Stearns v. Wright, 51 N. H. 610; Moses v. Julian, 45 N. H. 60.

Demurrer overruled.

Doe, O. J., did not sit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.H. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedell-v-bailey-nh-1876.