Becraft v. Strobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Becraft v. Strobel

248 A.D. 810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 248 A.D. 810 (Becraft v. Strobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Becraft v. Strobel, 248 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting the motion on the authority of Matter of Bradley (141N. Y. 527) and Matter of Fitzgerald (88 App. Div. 434). (The order dismisses the complaint in a proceeding under section 80 of the Public Officers Law to compel predecessor to deliver books and papers to Ms duly-elected successor.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting the motion on the authority of Matter of Bradley (141N. Y. 527) and Matter of Fitzgerald (88 App. Div. 434). (The order dismisses the complaint in a proceeding under section 80 of the Public Officers Law to compel predecessor to deliver books and papers to Ms duly-elected successor.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becraft-v-strobel-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack