Beckworth v. State

137 S.E. 862, 36 Ga. App. 650, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 213
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket17902
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 862 (Beckworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckworth v. State, 137 S.E. 862, 36 Ga. App. 650, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 213 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The first special ground of the motion for a new trial being' but an amplification of the general grounds, and the second ground not having been approved by the trial judge, this case is here upon the single assignment of error that the evidence did not authorize the ver[651]*651diet. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided April 12, 1927. H. O. Farr, W. G. Little, for plaintiff in error. J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, J. T. Grice, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 862, 36 Ga. App. 650, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckworth-v-state-gactapp-1927.