Beckwith v. Union Bank

1 Seld. Notes 176
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 31, 1853
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Seld. Notes 176 (Beckwith v. Union Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckwith v. Union Bank, 1 Seld. Notes 176 (N.Y. 1853).

Opinion

An insolvent firm, on the 24th of August, 1850, having on deposit in the Union Bank $3,600, made a general [177]*177assignment of their property to the plaintiff, as trustee, for the benefit of their creditors. No notice of the assignment was given to the bank, until the 28 th of August. On the 27th of August, a bill, exceeding in amount the sum on deposit, indorsed by the insolvent firm, and which had been discounted by the bank for the indorsers, became due, and was charged by the bank in their account. The assignee, after demand of the sum in deposit, brought this actiop to recover it, which was defended by the bank, on the ground that they had a right to apply, and had applied, the sum in deposit toward the payment of the bill.

Held, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. That his right to the money was complete, without giving notice of the assignment, and that the bank could not, as against him, apply the deposit in payment of the bill. That section 112 of the Code did not change the former rule in this respect, as to the substantial rights of the parties.

(S. C., 4 Sandf. 604; 9 N. Y. 211.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beckwith v. . the Union Bank of New-York
9 N.Y. 211 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Seld. Notes 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckwith-v-union-bank-ny-1853.