Beckwith v. Neal

849 F.2d 608, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8237, 1988 WL 60752
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 16, 1988
Docket88-5487
StatusUnpublished

This text of 849 F.2d 608 (Beckwith v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckwith v. Neal, 849 F.2d 608, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8237, 1988 WL 60752 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

849 F.2d 608

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Richard BECKWITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mr. & Mrs. Harold NEAL; Newt Metzger; Bender Realty
Company; Wanda K. Lawson; James D. Hutchins; Virginia N.
Smith; Mr. & Mrs. Egbert Critenden; Mr. Landin Boring;
Mr. C.B. "Buck" Howard; Mr. Fred Barnes; Bobby Long; Sam
Wilson; American Humane Association; Mr. Glen Ingram;
David L. Gatlin; Sgt. Dillard Gene Pilkey; Frederic
Chester, Jr., Attorney. Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-5487.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 16, 1988.

Before LIVELY and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court upon review of the file and pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the file and certified copies of the record indicates that the district court entered an order on April 22, 1988, denying appellant's motion for a temporary restraining order. Appellant immediately filed his notice of appeal on April 22, 1988.

This court lacks jurisdiction in the appeal. The denial of a temporary restraining order is generally not appealable. See United States v. Crusco, 464 F.2d 1060, 1062 (3d Cir.1972) (per curiam); Leslie v. Penn. Cent. R.R. Co., 410 F.2d 750 (6th Cir.1969) (per curiam); Dilworth v. Riner, 343 F.2d 226 (5th Cir.1965).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and is hereby dismissed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 F.2d 608, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8237, 1988 WL 60752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckwith-v-neal-ca6-1988.