Beckwith v. City of Plattsburgh
This text of 261 A.D. 854 (Beckwith v. City of Plattsburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The city appeals from a judgment entered after the verdict of a jury. The plaintiff received serious injuries while riding in an automobile along one of the defendant’s streets. There was sufficient evidence to present an issue as to defendant’s negligence. The charter of the city [Laws of 1902, chap. 269, § 143] contains an actual notice provision. The proof tended to show that the superintendent of public works had actual notice of the dangerous and unsafe condition of the street. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffeman and Poster, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents on the ground that no actual notice of the defective condition was given to the city at least five days before the accident.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 A.D. 854, 24 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckwith-v-city-of-plattsburgh-nyappdiv-1941.