Beckwith v. Beckwith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beckwith v. Beckwith

262 A.D. 925, 29 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6502

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 925 (Beckwith v. Beckwith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckwith v. Beckwith, 262 A.D. 925, 29 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from so much of an order of the Special Term entered in the Schenectady county clerk’s office on February 19, 1941, as denied plaintiff’s cross-motion to compel defendant to produce and discover certain documents and records. Order reversed on the law and facts, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Cross-motion for discovery and inspection granted, with ten dollars costs, in so far as the examination is limited to records in existence. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenek and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from so much of an order of the Special Term entered in the Schenectady county clerk’s office on February 19, 1941, as denied plaintiff’s cross-motion to compel defendant to produce and discover certain documents and records. Order reversed on the law and facts, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Cross-motion for discovery and inspection granted, with ten dollars costs, in so far as the examination is limited to records in existence. Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenek and Foster, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 925, 29 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckwith-v-beckwith-nyappdiv-1941.