Beckridge Corp. v. Brevort Developing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beckridge Corp. v. Brevort Developing Corp.

234 A.D. 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 886 (Beckridge Corp. v. Brevort Developing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckridge Corp. v. Brevort Developing Corp., 234 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and appellant’s motion to open his default and to vacate the judgment made thereon granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the appellant’s answer presents a partial defense to the plaintiff’s cause of action and his default on the trial is excusable. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and appellant’s motion to open his default and to vacate the judgment made thereon granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the appellant’s answer presents a partial defense to the plaintiff’s cause of action and his default on the trial is excusable. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckridge-corp-v-brevort-developing-corp-nyappdiv-1931.