Beckner v. Henquenet
This text of 1904 OK 16 (Beckner v. Henquenet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the court by
The plaintiff recovered judgment for fifteen dollars and costs against the defendant, for damages done by defendant’s cattle to plaintiff’s crops. Defendant appeals. Although the judge’s certificate recites that fact, the record does not contain all of the evidence. Hence, it is impossible to say that the judgment is not supported by the weight thereof. (Pappe v. American Fire Ins. Company, 8 Okla. 97; Ragains v. The Geiser Manufacturing Company, 10 Okla. 544.)
Nor can we determine that the newly discovered evidence was not cumulative merely. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed, at cost of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1904 OK 16, 75 P. 1131, 14 Okla. 3, 1904 Okla. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckner-v-henquenet-okla-1904.