Beckner v. Henquenet

1904 OK 16, 75 P. 1131, 14 Okla. 3, 1904 Okla. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 4, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 1904 OK 16 (Beckner v. Henquenet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckner v. Henquenet, 1904 OK 16, 75 P. 1131, 14 Okla. 3, 1904 Okla. LEXIS 46 (Okla. 1904).

Opinion

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The plaintiff recovered judgment for fifteen dollars and costs against the defendant, for damages done by defendant’s cattle to plaintiff’s crops. Defendant appeals. Although the judge’s certificate recites that fact, the record does not contain all of the evidence. Hence, it is impossible to say that the judgment is not supported by the weight thereof. (Pappe v. American Fire Ins. Company, 8 Okla. 97; Ragains v. The Geiser Manufacturing Company, 10 Okla. 544.)

Nor can we determine that the newly discovered evidence was not cumulative merely. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed, at cost of appellant.

Beauchamp, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Burford, C. J., absent; all the other Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pappe v. American Fire Insurance Co.
1899 OK 35 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1899)
Ragains v. Geiser Manufacturing Co.
63 P. 687 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1904 OK 16, 75 P. 1131, 14 Okla. 3, 1904 Okla. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckner-v-henquenet-okla-1904.