Beckmann v. Brandt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beckmann v. Brandt

261 A.D. 924, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8105

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 924 (Beckmann v. Brandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckmann v. Brandt, 261 A.D. 924, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

■ In a proceeding instituted pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the zoning board of appeals of the incorporated village of Island Park, denying petitioner’s application for a variance of a zoning ordinance of that village so as to permit the erection of oil storage tanks on property of the petitioner in said village, determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Order transferring proceedings for disposition, and denying appellants’ motion to strike out certain paragraphs of the petition, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent and against the intervenors-appellants No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■ In a proceeding instituted pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the zoning board of appeals of the incorporated village of Island Park, denying petitioner’s application for a variance of a zoning ordinance of that village so as to permit the erection of oil storage tanks on property of the petitioner in said village, determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Order transferring proceedings for disposition, and denying appellants’ motion to strike out certain paragraphs of the petition, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to petitioner-respondent and against the intervenors-appellants No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 924, 25 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckmann-v-brandt-nyappdiv-1941.