Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co.

182 S.E. 595, 181 Ga. 456, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 122

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 16, 1935

DocketNo. 10645

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 S.E. 595 (Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co., 182 S.E. 595, 181 Ga. 456, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 122 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, Chief Justice.

1. Assignments of error upon constitutional questions which are raised for the first time in. the bill of exceptions will not be considered. Dunaway v. Gore, 164 Ga. 219, 221 (138 S. E. 213).

2. The sole assignments of error sought to be presented by the bill of exceptions failing to properly raise any constitutional question for decision, this court is without jurisdiction, of the writ of error. The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction.

Transferred to the Cowrt of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Donnelly & Fleetwood, for plaintiffs. Hester & Clark, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI