Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co.

182 S.E. 595, 181 Ga. 456, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 122
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1935·No. No. 10645·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Russell, Chief Justice.

1. Assignments of error upon constitutional questions which are raised for the first time in. the bill of exceptions will not be considered. Dunaway v. Gore, 164 Ga. 219, 221 (138 S. E. 213).

2. The sole assignments of error sought to be presented by the bill of exceptions failing to properly raise any constitutional question for decision, this court is without jurisdiction, of the writ of error. The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction.

Transferred to the Cowrt of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Donnelly & Fleetwood, for plaintiffs. Hester & Clark, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co., 182 S.E. 595, 181 Ga. 456, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 122 (Ga. 1935).

182 S.E. 595 (Beckmann v. Atlantic Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stembridge v. Georgia
343 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1952)