Beckman v. Sysco
This text of Beckman v. Sysco (Beckman v. Sysco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Neal Beckman, Employee, Respondent,
v.
Sysco Columbia, LLC, Employer, and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Carrier, Petitioners.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001691
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from the Appellate Panel
South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission
Opinion No. 27590
Heard November 3, 2015 – Filed November 18, 2015
DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF
APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS
IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Kathryn Fiehrer Walton, of Wood Law Group, L.L.C., of Charleston, for Petitioners.
Frederick W. Riesen, Jr., of Riesen Law Firm, L.L.P., of N. Charleston, and Stephen Benjamin Samuels, of
Samuels Law Firm, L.L.C., of Columbia, both for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Beckman v. Sysco Columbia, L.L.C., 408 S.C. 501, 759 S.E.2d 750 (Ct. App. 2014). We first direct the Court of Appeals to depublish its opinion and assign the matter an unpublished opinion number. The above opinion shall no longer have any precedential effect. Next, we dismiss as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari.
Accordingly, we
DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Beckman v. Sysco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckman-v-sysco-sc-2015.