Beckman v. Sysco

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 18, 2015·No. 27590·Published

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court

Neal Beckman, Employee, Respondent,

v.

Sysco Columbia, LLC, Employer, and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Carrier, Petitioners.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001691

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from the Appellate Panel

South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission

Opinion No. 27590

Heard November 3, 2015 – Filed November 18, 2015

DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF

APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS

IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Kathryn Fiehrer Walton, of Wood Law Group, L.L.C., of Charleston, for Petitioners.

Frederick W. Riesen, Jr., of Riesen Law Firm, L.L.P., of N. Charleston, and Stephen Benjamin Samuels, of

Samuels Law Firm, L.L.C., of Columbia, both for

Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Beckman v. Sysco Columbia, L.L.C., 408 S.C. 501, 759 S.E.2d 750 (Ct. App. 2014). We first direct the Court of Appeals to depublish its opinion and assign the matter an unpublished opinion number. The above opinion shall no longer have any precedential effect. Next, we dismiss as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari.

Accordingly, we

DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckman v. Sysco, (S.C. 2015).

Beckman v. Sysco (Beckman v. Sysco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckman v. Sysco Columbia, LLC
759 S.E.2d 750 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2014)