Beckman (Jeremy) v. State

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 2015
Docket67158
StatusUnpublished

This text of Beckman (Jeremy) v. State (Beckman (Jeremy) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckman (Jeremy) v. State, (Neb. 2015).

Opinion

To the extent that appellant attempted to appeal from the denial of a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea and a motion to stay presentence investigation report, we dismiss the appeal in part because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying the aforementioned motions. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISS the appeal in part.

t CULA n , J. Parraguirre

ea Douglas LAI (a3 J.

J. Cherry

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20 Jeremy Leigh Beckman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A aeo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Beckman (Jeremy) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckman-jeremy-v-state-nev-2015.