Beckman (Jeremy) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 11, 2015·No. 67158·Unpublished

Opinion

To the extent that appellant attempted to appeal from the denial of a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea and a motion to stay presentence investigation report, we dismiss the appeal in part because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying the aforementioned motions. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISS the appeal in part.

t CULA n , J. Parraguirre

ea Douglas

LAI (a3 J.

J.

Cherry

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20 Jeremy Leigh Beckman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) 1947A aeo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckman (Jeremy) v. State, (Neb. 2015).

Beckman (Jeremy) v. State (Beckman (Jeremy) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)