Beckley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Beckley v. State

133 N.E. 883, 77 Ind. App. 558, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 36

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 1922·No. No. 11,303·Published

Opinion

McMahan, J.

Appellant was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a girl under eighteen years. Several days after the judgment was rendered, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling this motion. Since a motion in arrest of judgment must be made before judgment and not after, there was no error in overruling this motion. Hilligoss v. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. (1872), 40 Ind. 112; 16 C. J. p. 1263, §2814.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahan, J.

Appellant was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a girl under eighteen years. Several days after the judgment was rendered, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling this motion. Since a motion in arrest of judgment must be made before judgment and not after, there was no error in overruling this motion. Hilligoss v. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. (1872), 40 Ind. 112; 16 C. J. p. 1263, §2814.

Judgment affirmed.

Beckley v. State, 133 N.E. 883, 77 Ind. App. 558, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 36 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

133 N.E. 883 (Beckley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related