Beckley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Beckley v. State

133 N.E. 883, 77 Ind. App. 558, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 36

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 1922

DocketNo. 11,303

StatusPublished

This text of 133 N.E. 883 (Beckley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckley v. State, 133 N.E. 883, 77 Ind. App. 558, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 36 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

McMahan, J.

Appellant was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a girl under eighteen years. Several days after the judgment was rendered, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling this motion. Since a motion in arrest of judgment must be made before judgment and not after, there was no error in overruling this motion. Hilligoss v. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. (1872), 40 Ind. 112; 16 C. J. p. 1263, §2814.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMahan, J.

Appellant was convicted of contributing to the delinquency of a girl under eighteen years. Several days after the judgment was rendered, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling this motion. Since a motion in arrest of judgment must be made before judgment and not after, there was no error in overruling this motion. Hilligoss v. Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. (1872), 40 Ind. 112; 16 C. J. p. 1263, §2814.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 N.E. 883, 77 Ind. App. 558, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckley-v-state-indctapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack