Beckley v. Boardman
6 Conn. 372
This text of 6 Conn. 372 (Beckley v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beckley v. Boardman, 6 Conn. 372 (Colo. 1827).
Opinion
No rule will be made upon the officer in this case. But if he had notice not to pay the money over to Boardman, and has, notwithstanding such notice, made payment, the plaintiff in error may sustain indebitalus assumpsit against him for the money. If he paid it over without notice, the plaintiff in error is without redress as against him.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Robinette v. Price
8 N.W.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1943)
Reilly v. State
175 A. 582 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1934)
Drabant v. Cure
124 A. 340 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Conn. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckley-v-boardman-conn-1827.