Becklean v. Director of Revenue

961 S.W.2d 134, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 365, 1998 WL 83779
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1998·No. No. 21772·Published

Opinion

PREWITT, Judge.

Appellant filed a petition contesting the revocation of his driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test of his blood-alcohol content. The matter was tried on June 4, 1997, and taken under advisement until the following day. On June 5,1997, the docket sheet shows the following:

[[Image here]]

The appeal was taken from this writing. There is no other entry in the record which purports to be a judgment or other final determination of the trial court. For an entry to be a judgment under Rule 74.01(a), it must be denominated as a judgment, although not necessarily at the top of the writing. Brooks v. Director of Revenue, 954 S.W.2d 715 (Mo.App.1997). See also City of [135]*135St. Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850 (Mo. banc 1997). Absent a judgment, this Court does not have jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Brooks, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

GARRISON, P.J., and CROW, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Becklean v. Director of Revenue, 961 S.W.2d 134, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 365, 1998 WL 83779 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

961 S.W.2d 134 (Becklean v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of St. Louis v. Hughes
950 S.W.2d 850 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1997)
Brooks v. Director of Revenue
954 S.W.2d 715 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)