Beckham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beckham v. State

411 S.W.3d 338, 2013 WL 5561483, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 8, 2013·No. No. ED 99174·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sheldon Beckham appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Beckham’s request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

[339] An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sheldon Beckham appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Beckham’s request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

[339] An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Beckham v. State, 411 S.W.3d 338, 2013 WL 5561483, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1171 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

411 S.W.3d 338 (Beckham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.