Beckham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beckham v. State

264 So. 2d 30, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6476

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 1972

DocketNo. 71-1207

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 264 So. 2d 30 (Beckham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckham v. State, 264 So. 2d 30, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The contention presented by the defendant as a ground for reversal of his con[31]*31viction is ineffective assistance of his counsel in the handling of the cause in the trial court. There as here, the appellant was represented by the p'ublic defender. On the authority and reasoning of Geiger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 449, the judgment is affirmed, without prejudice to apply in the trial court for relief under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The contention presented by the defendant as a ground for reversal of his con[31]*31viction is ineffective assistance of his counsel in the handling of the cause in the trial court. There as here, the appellant was represented by the p'ublic defender. On the authority and reasoning of Geiger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 449, the judgment is affirmed, without prejudice to apply in the trial court for relief under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 So. 2d 30, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckham-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack