Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.

103 S.E. 857, 25 Ga. App. 592, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 93
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1920·No. 11605·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Conceding, but not deciding, that tlie petition as amended was subject to one or more of tlie special demurrers interposed, none of the special demurrers were passed upon, and the petition set out a cause of action, though it may have been defectively stated. The court, therefore, erred in dismissing the petition on general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Branch & Howard, Bond Almand, for plaintiff,

cited: Park’s [594] Code, §§ 2099, 2101; Tomlinson v. Armour, 74 N. J. L. 780 (65 Atl. 883); Bishop v. Weber, 139 Mass. 411 (1 N. E. 154); Doyle v. Fuerst, 129 La. 838 (56 So. 906, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 480); Ketterer v. Armour, 247 Fed. 921; Pantaze v. West, 7 Ala. App. 599 (61 So. 42); Blood Balm Co. v. Cooper, 83 Ga. 457; Watson v. Augusta Brewing Co., 124 Ga. 121; Martin v. Waycross Coca-Cola Co., 18 Ga. App. 226; Hudgins v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 122 Ga. 695 (distinguished).

Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins,

for defendant, cited and distinguished cases cited supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co., 103 S.E. 857, 25 Ga. App. 592, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 857 (Beckham v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Phillips
161 S.E. 163 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)