Beckford v. State

667 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1996 WL 61348
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 1996
DocketNo. 95-540
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 1007 (Beckford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckford v. State, 667 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1996 WL 61348 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the imposition of investigation and prosecution costs without a prior determination of the defendant’s ability to pay. See § 939.01 Fla.Stat. (1993). We reverse because the trial court failed to make adequate inquiry into the defendant’s ability to pay. This reversal is without prejudice to the reimposition of appropriate cost by the trial court upon compliance with proper procedures. Burdo v. State, 667 So.2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Blanco-Diaz v. State, 618 So.2d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roldan v. State
676 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Merrett v. State
670 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 So. 2d 1007, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1996 WL 61348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckford-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.