Beckfelt v. Donohue

97 N.W. 127, 90 Minn. 430, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 714
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedNovember 13, 1903
DocketNos. 13,564—(70)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 N.W. 127 (Beckfelt v. Donohue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beckfelt v. Donohue, 97 N.W. 127, 90 Minn. 430, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 714 (Mich. 1903).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to determine an adverse claim made by defendant to certain tracts of vacant and unoccupied land. The plaintiff purchased these tracts from the owner, and received a warranty deed, which he left, unrecorded, in the office of the register of deeds,, pending an application for an abatement of taxes delinquent for several years. The court below found that the defendant, whose pretended title was obtained by a quitclaim deed executed and delivered a few days subsequent to the conveyance to plaintiff, had notice of facts and circumstances when-he obtained his quitclaim deed which would put a reasonably prudent man on inquiry, and that he was not a purchaser in good faith, or for a valuable consideration. We have examined the testimony, and are of the opinion that it abundantly justified these findings of fact. The conclusions of law followed inevitably. A discussion of the testimony would be of no value to the profession, and for that reason we will not enter into it.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stipe v. Jefferson
257 N.W. 99 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 N.W. 127, 90 Minn. 430, 1903 Minn. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckfelt-v-donohue-minn-1903.